ClimateSearch

Luanshya, Copperbelt

Zambia · 193k people · 1234 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high81°F (27°C)82°F (28°C)82°F (28°C)82°F (28°C)81°F (27°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)83°F (29°C)89°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)87°F (31°C)82°F (28°C)
Average low62°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)57°F (14°C)50°F (10°C)45°F (7°C)44°F (7°C)49°F (9°C)55°F (13°C)61°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)
Dew point65°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)58°F (15°C)51°F (10°C)45°F (7°C)43°F (6°C)43°F (6°C)43°F (6°C)48°F (9°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)
Rainfall11 in (280 mm)9.2 in (233 mm)7.7 in (195 mm)1.6 in (40 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (1 mm)0.1 in (1 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)5.3 in (136 mm)11 in (280 mm)
Rainy days24201751000031323
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine133 h132 h182 h229 h266 h270 h277 h296 h292 h273 h206 h140 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.5°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

25 → 37

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.