ClimateSearch

Matsuyama, Ehime

Japan · 511k people · 26 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high50°F (10°C)52°F (11°C)59°F (15°C)68°F (20°C)76°F (24°C)81°F (27°C)88°F (31°C)90°F (32°C)84°F (29°C)75°F (24°C)64°F (18°C)54°F (12°C)
Average low36°F (2°C)37°F (3°C)42°F (6°C)51°F (10°C)59°F (15°C)68°F (20°C)75°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)59°F (15°C)48°F (9°C)39°F (4°C)
Dew point35°F (1°C)35°F (2°C)41°F (5°C)49°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)67°F (20°C)74°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)69°F (21°C)59°F (15°C)49°F (9°C)39°F (4°C)
Rainfall2.1 in (52 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)4.2 in (106 mm)5.3 in (136 mm)6 in (154 mm)9.7 in (248 mm)7.9 in (201 mm)5.8 in (147 mm)7.5 in (190 mm)6 in (153 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)
Rainy days9911109121089889
Snowfall2.6 in (6.7 cm)2.4 in (6 cm)0.5 in (1.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)1.5 in (3.8 cm)
Sunshine157 h157 h173 h175 h176 h117 h170 h209 h172 h180 h167 h165 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+0.9°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

8 → 30

About 4.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.