ClimateSearch

Nam Định, Ninh Binh

Vietnam · 448k people · 8 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high68°F (20°C)71°F (22°C)76°F (25°C)83°F (28°C)88°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)86°F (30°C)83°F (28°C)78°F (25°C)71°F (21°C)
Average low58°F (14°C)61°F (16°C)65°F (19°C)72°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)80°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)79°F (26°C)76°F (25°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)59°F (15°C)
Dew point55°F (13°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)69°F (21°C)62°F (17°C)55°F (13°C)
Rainfall1.1 in (28 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)2.6 in (67 mm)7.8 in (199 mm)7.5 in (192 mm)9.9 in (252 mm)13.4 in (341 mm)11 in (281 mm)5.5 in (139 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)1.3 in (33 mm)
Rainy days657917171824211497
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine146 h143 h175 h245 h287 h271 h267 h252 h255 h271 h231 h188 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.7°C) to +2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

61 91

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • October: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.