ClimateSearch

Nanchong, Sichuan

China · 1.9M people · 287 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high51°F (10°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)72°F (22°C)79°F (26°C)83°F (29°C)88°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)80°F (27°C)70°F (21°C)62°F (17°C)53°F (12°C)
Average low39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)48°F (9°C)57°F (14°C)64°F (18°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)60°F (15°C)51°F (10°C)42°F (6°C)
Dew point38°F (3°C)41°F (5°C)47°F (8°C)56°F (13°C)62°F (17°C)69°F (21°C)74°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)66°F (19°C)58°F (14°C)49°F (10°C)40°F (5°C)
Rainfall1 in (26 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)2.2 in (57 mm)3.7 in (94 mm)5.4 in (137 mm)7.4 in (187 mm)8.5 in (215 mm)6.7 in (170 mm)5.5 in (139 mm)3.9 in (99 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)1.2 in (31 mm)
Rainy days771112131417141315107
Snowfall0.4 in (0.9 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)
Sunshine151 h139 h179 h214 h237 h246 h291 h282 h193 h140 h133 h137 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +3.0°F (+1.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

32 62

About 1.9× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
  • October: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.