ClimateSearch

Ðông Hà, Quang Tri

Vietnam · 164k people · 19 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high74°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)81°F (27°C)87°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)94°F (34°C)92°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)84°F (29°C)80°F (27°C)76°F (25°C)
Average low63°F (17°C)65°F (18°C)69°F (20°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (25°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)69°F (21°C)66°F (19°C)
Dew point65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)70°F (21°C)74°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)69°F (21°C)65°F (19°C)
Rainfall5.6 in (142 mm)2 in (50 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)3.5 in (90 mm)1.9 in (50 mm)3.9 in (99 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)19.3 in (490 mm)19.2 in (489 mm)17 in (432 mm)11.2 in (285 mm)
Rainy days12564736616181717
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine90 h112 h161 h182 h185 h167 h160 h151 h131 h124 h101 h61 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.9°C) to +2.6°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

88 → 124

About 1.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • July: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • October: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.