ClimateSearch

Phủ Lý, Ninh Binh

Vietnam · 137k people · 10 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high67°F (19°C)69°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)80°F (27°C)87°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)85°F (29°C)78°F (26°C)71°F (22°C)
Average low58°F (15°C)61°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)76°F (24°C)79°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)76°F (25°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)60°F (16°C)
Dew point55°F (13°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)69°F (21°C)62°F (17°C)55°F (13°C)
Rainfall0.4 in (11 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)1.2 in (31 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)7 in (178 mm)6.6 in (169 mm)12.7 in (323 mm)12.4 in (315 mm)13.5 in (344 mm)3.4 in (86 mm)1.6 in (40 mm)1.1 in (29 mm)
Rainy days12341110151716634
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine59 h57 h68 h119 h144 h117 h119 h112 h132 h166 h138 h98 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

67 → 98

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • October: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.