ClimateSearch

Quilmes, Buenos Aires

Argentina · 262k people · 21 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high85°F (30°C)83°F (28°C)79°F (26°C)73°F (23°C)66°F (19°C)60°F (16°C)58°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)66°F (19°C)72°F (22°C)78°F (26°C)83°F (29°C)
Average low65°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)61°F (16°C)55°F (13°C)50°F (10°C)45°F (7°C)43°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)49°F (9°C)54°F (12°C)58°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)
Dew point63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)55°F (13°C)51°F (10°C)46°F (8°C)44°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)48°F (9°C)53°F (12°C)56°F (14°C)60°F (15°C)
Rainfall3.9 in (100 mm)4.3 in (109 mm)4.3 in (110 mm)3.7 in (94 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)2.9 in (74 mm)5 in (128 mm)4.3 in (108 mm)3.9 in (99 mm)
Rainy days666666666877
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine285 h231 h230 h182 h155 h142 h152 h170 h188 h209 h243 h281 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +2.9°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

4 → 7

About 1.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • February: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • March: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • October: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.