ClimateSearch

Rạch Giá, An Giang

Vietnam · 460k people · 9 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high85°F (29°C)87°F (31°C)90°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (30°C)87°F (30°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)85°F (30°C)
Average low72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)
Dew point69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)70°F (21°C)
Rainfall0.5 in (13 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)1.6 in (41 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)8.7 in (221 mm)9 in (229 mm)11.2 in (284 mm)10.8 in (273 mm)11.1 in (282 mm)10.5 in (266 mm)5.4 in (137 mm)1.9 in (48 mm)
Rainy days1048182022222221114
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine206 h210 h240 h219 h160 h122 h122 h126 h108 h122 h164 h177 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +2.7°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

58 → 92

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • April: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • July: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • November: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.