ClimateSearch

Sa Dec, Dong Thap

Vietnam · 215k people · 6 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (31°C)89°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)93°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)
Average low74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)79°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)
Dew point69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)
Rainfall0.6 in (15 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)1.9 in (48 mm)7 in (177 mm)7.2 in (182 mm)7.4 in (188 mm)7.4 in (188 mm)8.4 in (214 mm)9.7 in (246 mm)5.3 in (135 mm)2.2 in (55 mm)
Rainy days1014161819181921114
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine206 h212 h243 h222 h161 h125 h124 h127 h108 h124 h165 h175 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +3.1°F (+1.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

79 → 123

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.5°C)
  • March: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • October: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.