ClimateSearch

Sabanalarga, Atlántico

Colombia · 102k people · 93 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high92°F (34°C)94°F (34°C)93°F (34°C)93°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (34°C)92°F (34°C)91°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)90°F (32°C)92°F (33°C)
Average low72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)
Dew point71°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)
Rainfall0.3 in (7 mm)0.4 in (9 mm)0.8 in (19 mm)2 in (52 mm)4.7 in (120 mm)4.4 in (111 mm)4 in (102 mm)4.9 in (125 mm)5.9 in (151 mm)6.9 in (175 mm)4.4 in (112 mm)1.3 in (33 mm)
Rainy days011412109121518103
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine264 h243 h249 h187 h140 h147 h159 h143 h129 h135 h161 h225 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

84 → 135

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • May: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • June: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.