ClimateSearch

Sakura, Chiba

Japan · 174k people · 34 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high47°F (8°C)49°F (9°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)71°F (22°C)76°F (25°C)83°F (28°C)86°F (30°C)79°F (26°C)69°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)51°F (11°C)
Average low34°F (1°C)34°F (1°C)40°F (5°C)49°F (9°C)58°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)69°F (20°C)59°F (15°C)49°F (9°C)39°F (4°C)
Dew point30°F (-1°C)31°F (-1°C)38°F (3°C)47°F (8°C)56°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)67°F (19°C)57°F (14°C)47°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.9 in (75 mm)2.8 in (71 mm)4.9 in (125 mm)4.5 in (114 mm)5.1 in (129 mm)6.3 in (159 mm)6.1 in (156 mm)4.5 in (116 mm)7 in (177 mm)8.3 in (212 mm)4.1 in (103 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)
Rainy days881313121414121513118
Snowfall1.1 in (2.7 cm)1.7 in (4.4 cm)0.6 in (1.5 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)
Sunshine247 h228 h253 h269 h280 h242 h280 h320 h248 h224 h207 h223 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

9 23

About 2.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.