ClimateSearch

Sinop, Mato Grosso

Brazil · 224k people · 378 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high83°F (28°C)83°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)85°F (29°C)86°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (34°C)89°F (31°C)85°F (29°C)83°F (29°C)
Average low71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)67°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)69°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)
Dew point72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)67°F (20°C)61°F (16°C)57°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)
Rainfall11.6 in (294 mm)10.8 in (275 mm)9.9 in (250 mm)4.8 in (123 mm)1.2 in (32 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)5.7 in (144 mm)8.9 in (225 mm)11.3 in (287 mm)
Rainy days2926271971019202528
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine264 h247 h279 h295 h325 h323 h336 h340 h320 h314 h280 h271 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +2.1°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

79 135

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • August: +3.3°F (+1.9°C)
  • September: +4.2°F (+2.3°C)
  • October: +3.7°F (+2.0°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.