ClimateSearch

Sinop, Mato Grosso

Brazil · 224k people · 378 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (33°C)95°F (35°C)95°F (35°C)93°F (34°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)
Average low68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)60°F (16°C)59°F (15°C)61°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)67°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)
Dew point72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)67°F (20°C)61°F (16°C)57°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)
Rainfall13.4 in (340 mm)13.4 in (341 mm)10.7 in (272 mm)6.3 in (161 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0 in (1 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)1.6 in (41 mm)5.8 in (147 mm)11.2 in (285 mm)11.6 in (296 mm)
Rainy days2422211331015132021
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine118 h114 h134 h170 h214 h244 h271 h265 h223 h182 h135 h123 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +2.1°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

79 → 135

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • August: +3.3°F (+1.9°C)
  • September: +4.2°F (+2.3°C)
  • October: +3.7°F (+2.0°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.