ClimateSearch

Thị Trấn Đông Triều, Quảng Ninh

Vietnam · 249k people · 10 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high67°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)80°F (27°C)87°F (31°C)90°F (32°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)85°F (29°C)79°F (26°C)71°F (22°C)
Average low57°F (14°C)60°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)71°F (22°C)65°F (18°C)59°F (15°C)
Dew point53°F (12°C)57°F (14°C)63°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)75°F (24°C)69°F (20°C)62°F (16°C)54°F (12°C)
Rainfall0.5 in (13 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)1.6 in (40 mm)2.2 in (57 mm)8.6 in (218 mm)9.4 in (240 mm)13.4 in (340 mm)11.3 in (288 mm)8.1 in (205 mm)2.4 in (62 mm)1.4 in (34 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)
Rainy days23441314171714534
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine66 h57 h69 h120 h144 h113 h121 h118 h148 h188 h155 h109 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.7°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

53 → 83

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.