ClimateSearch

Tordher, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Pakistan · 150k people · 300 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high63°F (17°C)67°F (20°C)76°F (25°C)88°F (31°C)100°F (38°C)105°F (41°C)100°F (38°C)97°F (36°C)96°F (36°C)90°F (32°C)78°F (26°C)67°F (20°C)
Average low38°F (3°C)44°F (7°C)52°F (11°C)61°F (16°C)70°F (21°C)77°F (25°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)72°F (22°C)61°F (16°C)49°F (9°C)40°F (4°C)
Dew point37°F (3°C)41°F (5°C)49°F (9°C)55°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)64°F (18°C)74°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)70°F (21°C)57°F (14°C)47°F (8°C)40°F (4°C)
Rainfall1.8 in (46 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)2.1 in (54 mm)1.3 in (34 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)3.6 in (92 mm)4.3 in (109 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0.8 in (19 mm)
Rainy days567423685222
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine189 h173 h204 h234 h294 h318 h261 h246 h274 h265 h223 h213 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.3°F (+0.7°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.6°C) to +1.7°F (+0.9°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

119 → 123

Roughly unchanged

Warming by month
  • January: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +0.1°F (+0.0°C)
  • May: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • August: +0.4°F (+0.2°C)
  • September: −0.3°F (−0.2°C)
  • October: +0.2°F (+0.1°C)
  • November: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.