ClimateSearch

Tyler, Texas

United States · 104k people · 169 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high56°F (13°C)60°F (15°C)67°F (19°C)75°F (24°C)82°F (28°C)89°F (32°C)93°F (34°C)94°F (34°C)87°F (31°C)77°F (25°C)65°F (19°C)57°F (14°C)
Average low39°F (4°C)43°F (6°C)49°F (10°C)56°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)70°F (21°C)59°F (15°C)49°F (9°C)42°F (5°C)
Dew point38°F (3°C)41°F (5°C)47°F (9°C)54°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)63°F (17°C)54°F (12°C)46°F (8°C)40°F (5°C)
Rainfall3.5 in (88 mm)3.9 in (98 mm)4.2 in (107 mm)4.3 in (110 mm)4.5 in (115 mm)3.4 in (85 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)2.8 in (72 mm)4.2 in (107 mm)3.8 in (96 mm)4.1 in (105 mm)
Rainy days991091210877889
Snowfall0.3 in (0.8 cm)0.5 in (1.2 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)
Sunshine206 h198 h245 h291 h321 h348 h379 h366 h312 h272 h223 h201 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.6°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +4.8°F (+2.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

74 93

About 1.3× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • March: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • September: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +3.5°F (+1.9°C)
  • November: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • December: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.