ClimateSearch

Yangju, Gyeonggi-do

South Korea · 180k people · 71 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high35°F (1°C)40°F (5°C)51°F (11°C)64°F (18°C)74°F (23°C)80°F (27°C)83°F (28°C)85°F (29°C)78°F (26°C)67°F (20°C)53°F (11°C)38°F (3°C)
Average low17°F (-9°C)22°F (-6°C)31°F (-1°C)42°F (5°C)53°F (12°C)63°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)60°F (15°C)46°F (8°C)33°F (1°C)21°F (-6°C)
Dew point13°F (-11°C)17°F (-9°C)28°F (-2°C)39°F (4°C)51°F (11°C)61°F (16°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)60°F (16°C)46°F (8°C)32°F (0°C)18°F (-8°C)
Rainfall0.5 in (14 mm)0.8 in (19 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)4.6 in (116 mm)13.7 in (348 mm)11.3 in (286 mm)4.8 in (122 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)1.7 in (42 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)
Rainy days33577612116464
Snowfall2.5 in (6.3 cm)2 in (5 cm)1.4 in (3.6 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (1.1 cm)1.9 in (4.8 cm)
Sunshine177 h175 h200 h204 h201 h173 h116 h150 h170 h199 h161 h173 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +2.6°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

4 → 9

About 2.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • June: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.