ClimateSearch

Zipaquirá, Cundinamarca

Colombia · 130k people · 2613 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)66°F (19°C)65°F (18°C)65°F (18°C)65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)67°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)
Average low49°F (10°C)50°F (10°C)51°F (11°C)51°F (11°C)51°F (11°C)50°F (10°C)49°F (10°C)49°F (10°C)49°F (10°C)50°F (10°C)50°F (10°C)50°F (10°C)
Dew point47°F (9°C)48°F (9°C)50°F (10°C)51°F (11°C)51°F (10°C)49°F (10°C)48°F (9°C)47°F (9°C)47°F (9°C)49°F (9°C)50°F (10°C)49°F (9°C)
Rainfall2.3 in (59 mm)3.5 in (88 mm)6.8 in (173 mm)7.8 in (197 mm)5.6 in (143 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)2.9 in (74 mm)5.3 in (135 mm)5.5 in (141 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)
Rainy days141623252520201822252417
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine338 h298 h309 h279 h294 h311 h330 h341 h323 h300 h285 h325 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.0°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 0

Warming by month
  • January: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.