ClimateSearch

Aihara, Kanagawa

Japan · 725k people · 156 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high46°F (8°C)47°F (8°C)53°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)74°F (24°C)81°F (27°C)83°F (28°C)77°F (25°C)67°F (20°C)59°F (15°C)50°F (10°C)
Average low29°F (-2°C)30°F (-1°C)36°F (2°C)45°F (7°C)55°F (13°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)45°F (7°C)34°F (1°C)
Dew point27°F (-3°C)28°F (-2°C)36°F (2°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)44°F (7°C)33°F (1°C)
Rainfall3.2 in (82 mm)3.4 in (85 mm)6.1 in (155 mm)5.9 in (150 mm)6.4 in (162 mm)8.3 in (210 mm)8.2 in (209 mm)6.5 in (164 mm)9.4 in (238 mm)9.5 in (242 mm)4.3 in (109 mm)3 in (75 mm)
Rainy days8101514141618161615118
Snowfall5.9 in (15 cm)6.7 in (16.9 cm)3.9 in (9.9 cm)0.5 in (1.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)1.1 in (2.7 cm)
Sunshine254 h235 h257 h265 h274 h226 h265 h298 h239 h224 h216 h234 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.0°C) to +2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

3 6

About 2.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • March: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.