ClimateSearch

Cao Lãnh, Dong Thap

Vietnam · 212k people · 7 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (30°C)89°F (32°C)92°F (34°C)93°F (34°C)90°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (30°C)87°F (30°C)87°F (30°C)87°F (30°C)87°F (31°C)86°F (30°C)
Average low72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)
Dew point69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)71°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)70°F (21°C)
Rainfall1 in (24 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)3.2 in (80 mm)7.2 in (183 mm)8.7 in (221 mm)9.2 in (233 mm)9.6 in (244 mm)11.2 in (285 mm)11.6 in (295 mm)5.4 in (137 mm)2.5 in (65 mm)
Rainy days42613252728282927179
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine327 h314 h356 h340 h313 h270 h274 h276 h251 h264 h289 h301 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.6°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +5.4°F (+3.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

85 151

About 1.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • May: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • August: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.