ClimateSearch

Chũ, Bac Ninh

Vietnam · 128k people · 18 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high67°F (19°C)70°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)81°F (27°C)88°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)91°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (31°C)85°F (30°C)79°F (26°C)71°F (22°C)
Average low55°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)71°F (21°C)64°F (18°C)57°F (14°C)
Dew point52°F (11°C)56°F (13°C)62°F (17°C)69°F (21°C)74°F (23°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)74°F (23°C)67°F (20°C)60°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)
Rainfall0.4 in (10 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)7.9 in (201 mm)9.7 in (246 mm)12.9 in (329 mm)9.8 in (250 mm)6.2 in (158 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)1.1 in (29 mm)1.1 in (29 mm)
Rainy days14351315181712534
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine61 h51 h58 h108 h139 h109 h119 h118 h152 h190 h151 h107 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.7°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

43 → 69

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.