ClimateSearch

Ibaraki, Osaka

Japan · 288k people · 14 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high49°F (10°C)51°F (11°C)58°F (14°C)68°F (20°C)77°F (25°C)83°F (28°C)90°F (32°C)93°F (34°C)85°F (29°C)74°F (24°C)64°F (18°C)54°F (12°C)
Average low35°F (2°C)35°F (2°C)40°F (5°C)49°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)67°F (19°C)75°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)58°F (15°C)47°F (9°C)39°F (4°C)
Dew point31°F (0°C)31°F (0°C)37°F (3°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)56°F (13°C)46°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2 in (50 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)4 in (102 mm)4.6 in (117 mm)5.1 in (129 mm)6.8 in (172 mm)6.4 in (162 mm)4 in (101 mm)6.5 in (165 mm)5.6 in (142 mm)2.6 in (67 mm)1.8 in (46 mm)
Rainy days5691099969865
Snowfall0.4 in (1 cm)1.2 in (3 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.4 cm)
Sunshine168 h155 h174 h171 h176 h126 h164 h217 h167 h171 h162 h168 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.8°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

17 → 48

About 2.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.