ClimateSearch

Neyagawa, Osaka

Japan · 239k people · 11 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high47°F (8°C)48°F (9°C)55°F (13°C)65°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)79°F (26°C)85°F (30°C)89°F (31°C)81°F (27°C)71°F (22°C)61°F (16°C)51°F (11°C)
Average low33°F (1°C)33°F (1°C)38°F (3°C)47°F (8°C)56°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)46°F (8°C)37°F (3°C)
Dew point31°F (0°C)31°F (0°C)37°F (3°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)56°F (13°C)46°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.3 in (59 mm)2.5 in (65 mm)4.3 in (109 mm)4.5 in (114 mm)5.2 in (133 mm)7.4 in (187 mm)6.9 in (177 mm)3.6 in (90 mm)5.8 in (146 mm)6 in (152 mm)3 in (77 mm)2.3 in (59 mm)
Rainy days7811111013149111077
Snowfall0.6 in (1.4 cm)1.2 in (3.1 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)
Sunshine244 h230 h269 h268 h295 h255 h298 h332 h263 h251 h231 h238 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.8°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

17 48

About 2.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.