ClimateSearch

Neyagawa, Osaka

Japan · 239k people · 11 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high49°F (10°C)51°F (11°C)58°F (14°C)69°F (20°C)77°F (25°C)83°F (28°C)90°F (32°C)93°F (34°C)85°F (29°C)74°F (24°C)65°F (18°C)55°F (13°C)
Average low35°F (1°C)35°F (2°C)40°F (5°C)49°F (10°C)59°F (15°C)67°F (19°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)69°F (21°C)58°F (15°C)47°F (9°C)38°F (4°C)
Dew point31°F (0°C)31°F (0°C)37°F (3°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)56°F (13°C)46°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall1.9 in (47 mm)2.2 in (55 mm)4 in (101 mm)4.6 in (117 mm)5.1 in (129 mm)6.8 in (173 mm)6.3 in (160 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)6.5 in (166 mm)5.7 in (145 mm)2.5 in (65 mm)1.7 in (42 mm)
Rainy days561010910958865
Snowfall0.6 in (1.4 cm)1.2 in (3.1 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)
Sunshine166 h151 h172 h169 h172 h124 h162 h215 h164 h168 h160 h166 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.8°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

17 → 48

About 2.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.