ClimateSearch

Kalulushi, Copperbelt

Zambia · 104k people · 1302 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high79°F (26°C)80°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)83°F (28°C)89°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)85°F (30°C)80°F (27°C)
Average low60°F (15°C)60°F (15°C)59°F (15°C)55°F (13°C)48°F (9°C)42°F (5°C)41°F (5°C)46°F (8°C)53°F (12°C)58°F (15°C)60°F (15°C)60°F (15°C)
Dew point64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)58°F (14°C)50°F (10°C)45°F (7°C)42°F (6°C)42°F (6°C)43°F (6°C)48°F (9°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)
Rainfall11.1 in (281 mm)8.8 in (224 mm)7.9 in (201 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)0.2 in (5 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)5.4 in (138 mm)10.9 in (276 mm)
Rainy days24201751000031323
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine131 h126 h175 h225 h264 h270 h279 h293 h286 h263 h197 h138 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

21 → 31

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • February: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • December: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.