ClimateSearch

Ndola, Copperbelt

Zambia · 628k people · 1309 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high80°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)82°F (28°C)82°F (28°C)81°F (27°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)82°F (28°C)88°F (31°C)90°F (32°C)86°F (30°C)81°F (27°C)
Average low62°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)57°F (14°C)51°F (10°C)45°F (7°C)45°F (7°C)49°F (10°C)56°F (13°C)61°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)
Dew point64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)58°F (14°C)50°F (10°C)45°F (7°C)42°F (6°C)42°F (6°C)42°F (6°C)48°F (9°C)58°F (14°C)63°F (17°C)
Rainfall10.7 in (271 mm)9.2 in (233 mm)7.1 in (180 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (1 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)4.9 in (124 mm)11.4 in (290 mm)
Rainy days24211751000031324
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine125 h126 h178 h227 h264 h270 h278 h294 h287 h268 h204 h136 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.5°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

19 → 29

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.