ClimateSearch

Khuzdar, Balochistan

Pakistan · 218k people · 1229 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high64°F (18°C)70°F (21°C)78°F (26°C)88°F (31°C)97°F (36°C)100°F (38°C)98°F (37°C)96°F (35°C)94°F (34°C)88°F (31°C)78°F (25°C)69°F (21°C)
Average low38°F (4°C)43°F (6°C)52°F (11°C)62°F (17°C)71°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)59°F (15°C)48°F (9°C)40°F (4°C)
Dew point27°F (-3°C)28°F (-2°C)31°F (-1°C)31°F (-1°C)32°F (0°C)43°F (6°C)58°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)44°F (7°C)30°F (-1°C)28°F (-2°C)25°F (-4°C)
Rainfall0.7 in (18 mm)1 in (26 mm)1 in (26 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)0.5 in (14 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)1.7 in (43 mm)2.5 in (65 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)
Rainy days333223552011
Snowfall0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine243 h235 h265 h292 h337 h331 h282 h273 h287 h313 h271 h254 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.6°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

136 → 147

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.2°F (+0.6°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • September: +0.6°F (+0.4°C)
  • October: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.