ClimateSearch

Murmansk, Murmansk

Russia · 295k people · 61 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high17°F (-8°C)18°F (-8°C)26°F (-3°C)36°F (2°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)62°F (17°C)58°F (14°C)49°F (10°C)36°F (2°C)26°F (-3°C)22°F (-6°C)
Average low8°F (-13°C)9°F (-13°C)16°F (-9°C)24°F (-4°C)33°F (1°C)42°F (6°C)49°F (10°C)47°F (8°C)41°F (5°C)30°F (-1°C)19°F (-7°C)13°F (-10°C)
Dew point9°F (-13°C)9°F (-13°C)16°F (-9°C)23°F (-5°C)31°F (-1°C)40°F (4°C)47°F (9°C)46°F (8°C)40°F (4°C)30°F (-1°C)20°F (-7°C)14°F (-10°C)
Rainfall1 in (26 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)1.1 in (29 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)2 in (51 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)
Rainy days9791013131312131289
Snowfall8.2 in (20.9 cm)6.9 in (17.5 cm)9.1 in (23.1 cm)8.2 in (20.8 cm)5.5 in (14 cm)0.9 in (2.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (1 cm)8 in (20.3 cm)8 in (20.2 cm)8.5 in (21.7 cm)
Sunshine7 h79 h207 h288 h324 h351 h347 h248 h175 h95 h12 h0 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.6°F (+0.9°C) to +4.2°F (+2.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 0

Warming by month
  • January: +5.0°F (+2.8°C)
  • February: +3.5°F (+2.0°C)
  • March: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • April: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • May: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • June: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • September: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +3.9°F (+2.2°C)
  • December: +4.2°F (+2.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.