ClimateSearch

Takarazuka, Hyōgo

Japan · 226k people · 31 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high49°F (9°C)50°F (10°C)57°F (14°C)68°F (20°C)77°F (25°C)82°F (28°C)89°F (32°C)92°F (33°C)84°F (29°C)74°F (23°C)64°F (18°C)54°F (12°C)
Average low35°F (1°C)35°F (2°C)40°F (5°C)49°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)67°F (19°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)58°F (15°C)47°F (9°C)38°F (4°C)
Dew point32°F (0°C)32°F (0°C)37°F (3°C)46°F (8°C)56°F (13°C)65°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)67°F (19°C)56°F (14°C)46°F (8°C)37°F (3°C)
Rainfall1.9 in (48 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)4.5 in (114 mm)5 in (128 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)6 in (152 mm)3.6 in (92 mm)6.3 in (161 mm)5.4 in (136 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)1.9 in (48 mm)
Rainy days5710999969865
Snowfall0.4 in (1.1 cm)1.3 in (3.2 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)
Sunshine169 h157 h176 h172 h177 h127 h163 h215 h168 h172 h162 h168 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.7°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

14 → 38

About 2.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.