ClimateSearch

Takatsuki, Osaka

Japan · 354k people · 13 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high47°F (8°C)48°F (9°C)55°F (13°C)65°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)79°F (26°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)81°F (27°C)71°F (22°C)61°F (16°C)51°F (11°C)
Average low33°F (0°C)33°F (1°C)38°F (3°C)47°F (8°C)56°F (13°C)65°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)46°F (8°C)37°F (3°C)
Dew point31°F (0°C)31°F (0°C)37°F (3°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)56°F (13°C)46°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.3 in (58 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)4.4 in (112 mm)4.8 in (122 mm)5.6 in (143 mm)7.8 in (199 mm)7.7 in (195 mm)4.4 in (112 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)6.3 in (159 mm)3.2 in (82 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)
Rainy days68111111131512121077
Snowfall0.5 in (1.2 cm)1.2 in (3.1 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)
Sunshine247 h233 h270 h270 h298 h258 h299 h333 h266 h253 h233 h241 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.8°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

17 47

About 2.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.